Converge the drift
Three refactors and three half-applied patterns become one clean structure, so a change stops having surprise blast radius across the app.
Vibe coding rescue · Lovable
Your Lovable app breaks every time you prompt it.
That is the AI hitting its ceiling, not you failing. Once a Lovable app outgrows the tool’s context window, each new prompt fixes one thing and quietly breaks two others, because the model can no longer hold the whole codebase in view. The fix is an engineer who can, we restructure it into something stable, so you can keep building without the whack-a-mole.
There is a predictable wall in every vibe-coding tool. For the first few dozen screens it feels like magic; then the codebase gets big enough that the AI stops seeing all of it at once. From there, every fix is a gamble: the change you asked for lands, and something you shipped last week silently regresses. You end up prompting more and trusting less.
This is a structure problem, not a prompting problem, and it does not fix itself with a better prompt. We read the whole codebase with senior eyes, converge the layers of half-replaced logic into one coherent structure, add tests around the parts that matter, and hand you back an app that is safe to keep prompting on, by us, or by you in {Tool}.
How we fix it.
The review that never happened
Hundreds of accepted AI suggestions get the full-codebase review the tab key skipped, individually fine, collectively drifting, now made coherent.
Tests around the money paths
We add tests where it counts first, auth, payments, data writes, so future prompting is safe rather than roulette.
Specific to Lovable
What usually needs attention in Lovable apps.
Supabase RLS off
The tables work because everything can read them. Real row-level security policies, written and tested per table, are the single most skipped step in Lovable apps.
Keys in the client
Service-role keys or third-party API keys living in frontend code, shipped to every visitor. We move every secret server-side and rotate what was exposed.
Prompt loop decay
Past a certain size, fixes start breaking earlier features. We restructure the codebase so it is stable to build on, by us or by your next Lovable session.
How a rescue works.
Fixed price, milestone payments, and a written audit before you commit to anything.
Audit, 48 hours
Send repo or tool access. You get a plain-language report of what is solid, what is dangerous, what is unfinished, and a fixed price for the rest.
Fix and harden
Security first: auth, data access, secrets, rate limits, payments. The invisible work that keeps your launch out of the news for the wrong reason.
Finish and launch
The stalled features get built, the deploy pipeline gets set up, and the app goes live on your domain with monitoring, alerts, and daily backups.
Stay if you want
Every rescue includes 30 days of fixes. Many founders keep us on afterwards for the roadmap, through Resident™, our monthly retainer.
Questions
Why does my Lovable app break every time I prompt a change?
The codebase has outgrown the tool’s context window. The AI can no longer hold all of it in view, so a fix in one place regresses something elsewhere it can no longer see. It is a size and structure limit, not a mistake you made.
Can you make my Lovable app stable to keep building on?
Yes, that is the point. We restructure the codebase into something coherent and documented, add tests around the critical paths, and hand it back with conventions that make future prompting in Lovable far less likely to break things.
Will you rewrite it from scratch?
No. Full rewrites are usually ego, not engineering. Lovable produces plenty of usable code; we keep what works, restructure what will not scale, and rebuild only the unsafe or broken parts. You already paid for the 80%, we make the 20% that ships it reliable.
Send us your Lovable project.
Book a 30-minute call with a founder. Within 48 hours of access you will know what is solid, what is dangerous, and what it costs to launch.
